GLOBAL PARTNERS
The work of Project Play has inspired leaders beyond the United States. Aspen Institute affiliates in other countries created related initiatives to build healthier children through sports. We also partner with organizations in the international sport-for-all movement to share knowledge and apply resources that can improve sport delivery systems.
WORLD’S LEADING SPORT SYSTEMS
Project Play conducted research on the sport systems in 12 countries with a focus on the role of government, NOCs and NGBs in advancing organized sport development at the youth level. The countries in our comparative analysis were selected based on geographic, population, cultural and economic factors, as well as sport performance in international events. Below are links to summaries of each country. The full report can be found here, and a blog with high-level findings here.
Population | Youth Sport Participation (i) | Government Support (i) | Elite Sport Rank (ii) | Elite Sport Rank Per Capita | |
United States | 331M | C | D | 1 | 40 |
Norway | 5M | A- | A- | 11 | 1 |
Spain | 48M | B+ | C | 17 | 36 |
Sweden | 10M | B+ | B | 12 | 6 |
Australia | 26M | B- | C- | 7 | 9 |
Germany | 83M | B- | B+ | 9 | 32 |
Japan | 126M | B- | B | 8 | 41 |
New Zealand | 5M | B- | A | 24 | 4 |
Canada | 38M | C+ | B- | 5 | 11 |
France | 68M | C | B | 2 | 26 |
United Kingdom | 67M | D | B | 4 | 28 |
China | 1.4B | F | D | 3 | 61 |
(i) Most grades in Youth Sport Participation and Government Support categories are drawn from a 2022 report by the Active Healthy Kids Global Alliance, a not-for-profit comprised of researchers, health professionals and stakeholders who work together to advance physical activity in children and adolescents. Report cards for the countries evaluated are based on a harmonized framework and standardized grading rubric, as reflected in the Global Matrix 4.0. A grade of C, for instance, means a country is “succeeding with about half (47-53%) of children.”
The Government Support grade is given by experts in that country based on “evidence of leadership and commitment” by government “in providing physical activity opportunities or participation of children and adolescents through policy, legislation or regulation.” No grades were offered in the Global Matrix report for Norway, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the U.S., so the Aspen Institute consulted experts in each country, using the same criteria. In the U.S., “D” was the weighted grade offered by 90 experts engaged with Project Play, among them youth sport industry leaders surveyed at a recent conference hosted by LeagueApps.
(ii) The Elite Sport Rank and Elite Sport Rank Per Capita categories are drawn from Greatest Sporting Nation, a website that analyzes elite international competition results in Olympic and other sports, not including those that involve animals or cars. The first category is a measure of the total number of athletes and teams in 2022 who performed well in competition, while the latter calculates results relative to a nation’s total population.
INSIGHTS AND IDEAS
Content on best practices in youth sport and athletic development from around the world